Bitcoin's hashrate, a key indicator of the network's security and mining activity, has seen some dramatic swings recently. Geopolitical events, environmental issues, technological changes, and potential errors in reporting contribute to the volatility. Together, their engagement forms a daunting terrain that can lead to discouragement. To navigate this reality, or to simply understand it, is critical to anyone operating in—or with a vested interest in—the crypto space. Our friends over at KnowingCoin.com offer some helpful context to explain the top drivers fueling this mining ride. Find out what it all means for the future of Bitcoin with our straightforward analysis.

Geopolitical and Environmental Influences on Hashrate

There are a number of global events that can quickly and severely affect Bitcoin’s hashrate. For instance, escalating tensions between the US and Iran, potentially including airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, could disrupt mining operations. Readers might picture Iran as an important Bitcoin mining player, providing 3.1% of the global hashrate. For its part, the Central American country has welcomed and touted Bitcoin mining. This provision would allow for revenue generation or escaping revenue limits.

Iran has employed internet blackouts to guard against foreign cyberattacks. Nevertheless, these blackouts halt the country’s Bitcoin mining activities. When miners experience a loss of internet connectivity, they are unable to rejoin the network and their production cannot be counted, which contributes to the loss of total hashrate. Whether you agree with Bitcoin policy or not, these events underscore how political volatility and governmental decision-making can lead to tangible effects of the Bitcoin network.

Environmental concerns are another major factor. Increased demand for energy due to electricity-intensive bitcoin mining will amplify harmful carbon emissions at a sizable scale. According to estimates, Bitcoin mining alone emitted more than 85.89 Mt of CO2 just from 2020 to 2021. The industry's greenhouse gas emissions alone could potentially push global warming beyond the Paris Agreement's 2-degree Celsius target. In addition to climate impacts, Bitcoin mining has serious air pollution harms, and serious water and environmental impacts, particularly if hosted with hydropower. Regulatory backlash is increasing on environmental grounds, particularly in crypto-friendly states such as Texas. This could severely affect the profitability of mining and introduce great volatility in terms of hashrate.

Technological Advancements and Institutional Participation

Technological advancements in mining hardware are a primary driver of the growing hashrate. High-tech mining rigs have begun to be deployed. Both the X21 series and MicroBT’s M6X provide orders of magnitude more computational power per megawatt than legacy models. Second is the hashrate, which has recently climbed above 39 exahash per second (EH/s), a beautiful reflection of how these tech advances can help.

Companies such as Bitdeer are putting serious moves on the ASIC development power-play, having a big hand in pushing the hashrate faster and steeper into positive territory. Technological advancements in the mining sector have increased efficiency and productivity dramatically. Because of that trend, more miners are doubling down, ordering new equipment and growing their operation.

Increased institutional participation is another important factor. Companies like CleanSpark, Riot Blockchain, and Core Scientific are investing heavily in advanced mining infrastructure, contributing to the overall hashrate growth. More players and institutions are coming into the mining sector. They are bringing more capital and resources, which is accelerating the development and deployment of advanced mining technologies. This can be seen as a trend of the hashrate continuing to grow, and as more institutions get involved, the more it will grow.

Impact on Network Security and Potential Misreporting

The hashrate, compounded by the capitulation, is putting extreme downward pressure on the Bitcoin network security. The higher the hashrate, the more difficult it is for malicious actors to take over the majority of the network’s computing power. This greatly reduces the risk of the dreaded 51% attack occurring. Conversely, a lower hashrate increases this risk. The hashrate refers to how many guesses we are making at the hash value per second. In doing so, this estimate assumes all Bitcoin miners are cooperating.

The Bitcoin network makes a difficulty adjustment every 2016 blocks. This keeps the average block time under 10 minutes. Shifts in hashrate are the sole determinant of this difficulty, which means this is a measure of the security of the network. When the hashrate suddenly jumps, such as with the advent of mining pools, the time between blocks may drop below 10 minutes. A sudden drop in hashrate can increase the length of block times allowing bad actors to more easily attack a network by executing a double spend.

What’s equally as important is being mindful of the misattribution that follows a change in hashrate. Social media posts may incorrectly attribute a dip in hashrate to a specific event, such as an attack on Iranian miners. The real reason might have nothing to do with any of that. For example, seasonal curtailment in North America could be involved, where energy limitations or other factors periodically limit the energy-intensive mining process to seasonal operations. Takeaway Always confirm information from several sources before assuming that you understand what is causing hashrate growth or decline.

%%